Mexico: Telecom Law Sparks Debate Among Leaders

Share this article
Share this article
Prioritise Us on Google
The recent overhaul of Mexico’s telecommunications legislation has generated significant debate
Telecommunications and Broadcasting Law, introduced in Mexico, draws scrutiny as 15 million Mexicans remain without internet access

The recent overhaul of Mexico’s telecommunications legislation has generated significant debate within the sector, both domestically and internationally. Understanding the evolving regulatory landscape is crucial for telcos’ compliance, strategic planning, and operational continuity. 

Background and legislative intent

The new Telecommunications and Broadcasting Law, introduced by President Claudia Sheinbaum, was designed to address several pressing issues in the Mexican telecoms landscape. The government’s objectives include increasing digital connectivity, expanding internet access to the estimated 15 million Mexicans currently offline and safeguarding national sovereignty by restricting foreign interference in Mexican media.

Mexico's President, Claudia Sheinbaum

President Sheinbaum highlighted: “There are many places without coverage, and we want coverage. How? There’s legislation in Brazil—that’s where we took it—whereby the private sector, for example, can say, ‘I’ll provide you with coverage in this entire area free of charge based on the concession rights’; that can be done.”

Controversy over Article 109: Censorship concerns

Despite these ambitions, the reform quickly became mired in controversy. Article 109, a provision allowing authorities to request the temporary blocking of digital platforms for non-compliance with legal obligations, drew sharp criticism from civil society, opposition lawmakers, and international observers.

Commentators warned that the vague language in Article 109 could be interpreted as enabling government censorship and restricting freedom of expression.

“The proposed law - submitted by the Executive Power - provides for excessively broad and ambiguous provisions that would authorise the Agency for Digital Transformation and Telecommunications to temporarily block digital platforms at the request of the relevant authorities without clearly defining the applicable circumstances or establishing adequate control mechanisms.

"The breadth of these powers and the lack of precision in their regulation have aroused deep concern due to their possible impact on freedom of speech and the right to information, as well as the legal uncertainty they generate.”

The Mexican Bar Association and Stanford Law School’s Rule of Law Impact Lab noted:

Opposition figures were even more direct. Ricardo Anaya, senator and former presidential candidate, stated: “Morena (National Regeneration Movement) is seeking total control over the internet, social media, radio and television. This is not an isolated incident; it is part of a broader agenda for censorship and control”.

Ricardo Anaya, senator and former presidential candidate

Government response and legislative adjustments

In response to the backlash, President Sheinbaum called for modifications to the bill, specifically targeting Article 109. She stated: “If it’s creating confusion and people perceive it as censorship, that has never been the intention.

In any case, the article should be either removed or its language altered to ensure it is crystal clear that the Mexican government will not censor anyone, especially not what is shared on digital platforms”.

Subsequently, the government removed Article 109 from the proposed law to prevent misinterpretation and address potential censorship concerns.

International and industry implications

The Institute of Telecommunications Law (IDET) and other stakeholders have raised additional concerns regarding the law’s compliance with international agreements, particularly the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

IDET highlighted that the legislation could violate provisions guaranteeing regulatory independence and fair competition and warned that restrictions on cross-border data flows might provoke international disputes.

There is an apprehension that significant fines and regulatory uncertainty could prompt major digital platforms to reconsider their presence in Mexico, potentially impacting service availability and investment in the sector.

Beyond the censorship debate, the law aims to:
  • Restructure the regulatory framework by transferring key functions to new or existing agencies, such as the Antitrust Commission and the Agency for Digital Transformation and Telecommunications.
  • Enable the Federal Electricity Commission (CFE) to provide internet services in underserved areas, on equal terms with private operators.
  • Simplify spectrum access and infrastructure deployment, particularly for community and public broadcasters, focusing on Indigenous and marginalised communities.

Legislative processing of the article was paused to allow for broader consultation with stakeholders. As the Mexican Bar Association and the Rule of Law Impact Lab observed, “Any telecommunications and broadcasting regulation must align with international freedom of speech standards. Those standards are essential pillars of all law-abiding democratic states”.

Youtube Placeholder

Players in Mexico’s telecommunications space

The major telecommunications companies in Mexico that would be directly impacted by Article 19 of the new Telecommunications and Broadcasting Law are industry leaders with extensive market presence and infrastructure investments. América Móvil, through its subsidiaries Telcel and Telmex, dominates both the mobile and fixed-line sectors, providing services to most Mexican consumers.

Grupo Televisa is another key player, leveraging its strong media influence and expanding its telecommunications offerings, while Axtel and Izzi Mexico contribute notably in broadband and corporate solutions. AT&T Mexico and Movistar (Telefónica Movistar México) hold significant shares in the mobile and broadband markets, challenging the dominance of local giants with aggressive investment and competitive pricing strategies.

Additional concerns are the law’s compliance with international agreements, particularly the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement | Photo: Imagefx

The companies operate critical digital platforms and networks that would be subject to any regulatory provisions allowing the government to block services or impose data retention requirements. If not addressed, Article 19’s measures, particularly those concerning prior censorship and service suspension, could affect how these firms manage content transmission, data privacy and service continuity.

As the law introduces new compliance obligations and potential penalties, the evolving regulatory environment will shape the operational and strategic decisions of these leading telcos, including their willingness to invest further in Mexico’s digital infrastructure.

The evolving regulatory environment presents both opportunities and risks for telcos operating in or with Mexico. While the government’s commitment to expanding connectivity is apparent, ongoing dialogue and legal clarity will effectively balance industry growth, regulatory compliance, and fundamental rights. The sector will watch closely as the revised bill evolves in the coming weeks.


Explore the latest edition of Mobile Magazine and be part of the conversation at our global conference series, Tech & AI LIVE and Cloud & 5G LIVE. Discover all our upcoming events and secure your tickets today.

Sign up to receive the Mobile Magazine weekly newsletter.

 


Mobile Magazine is a BizClik brand